Quoting Michael Bramer (m.bra...@deb-support.de): > If a description need reviewer, and it is reviewed from one or more > reviewer, one week since the last change/update count as one reviewer. > > > Count this still a bug?
So, that theoretically allows a single person to do DDTP stuff, without any review, for a given language. Depending on how you consider this, this could be considered a bug....or a feature, indeed. Could this be made easily configurable somewhere? Indeed, what I would like to see configurable in DDT* (preferrably in a config file more than hard-coded in the scripts: Per language: - number of reviewers - the above feature (delay without review counts as a review) - the delay in the above feature - anonymous contributions allowed or not (maybe this is a DDTSS-only feature) Also, having the possibility to revive "general" messages (visible for all users and stored in a simple text file on i18n.debian.net) as well as "team" messages (which could be edited by privileged users for the said language....which means defining a "superuser" for each language....that superuser being set by....the i18n gurus.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
