Modestas Vainius wrote: > I don't think it is a fair statement. Examples of minimal dh rules all over > the place in your blog, debhelper package and dh manual page DO NOT have > build > flags handling. It is true that it's the result of inappropriate dpkg- > buildpackage behaviour but it's still a bad practise pushed debhelper from > the > advent of dh so you should feel at least a bit responsible.
This has nothing to do with dh. No example rules file *ever* shipped with debhelper has included build flag handling. Contrary to popular belief, most packages get this right without having flags forced. (The only exception to this is noopt handling, which could still be enabled outside v9 mode.) -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
