On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 12:54 +0200, Thomas Girard wrote: > as per #630897 ace needs to be repackaged in stable only. > > Details available at [1]; just let me know if something is missing or > unclear. [...] > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630897#37
Sorry, this seems to have fallen off our radar at some point. As a general comment, when you're providing pre-built packages for people to check, it's generally helpful if the .dsc / .changes are signed, to provide some sort of trust path for the download. Overall, the re-packaging looks okay; thanks. Checking the diff was made slightly more annoying by the fact that the source package is tarball-in-tarball and packaged in a way that debdiff's automatic support for that format doesn't seem to like, but never mind. One quick question on the changes, however: -ace (5.7.7-4) unstable; urgency=high +ace (5.7.7+dfsg-1) stable; urgency=low [...] +ace (5.7.7-4) unstable; urgency=low Why was the urgency on the -4 stanza changed? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
