Hi, Ximin Luo wrote (04 Aug 2011 09:48:25 GMT) : > cs-lite has been stable for several years now with no major bugs > reported that i can see on the review page.
I'm not concerned with current bugs in cs-lite. I'm concerned with compatibility with future Iceweasel releases, which has not been taken care of upstream in the last two years. As long as the only change needed to have it working with newer Iceweasel is bumping maxVersion, which you've been doing it seems, so far so good, all systems green :) The question is: who will update cs-lite if more changes are needed? Once this matter is clarified, once I know who's in charge, I'll certainly be very happy to see cookiesafe-lite in Debian. > we can decide whether to let it propagate to wheezy after it's been > around in sid for a while. experimental might be better suited if you don't want it to migrate to testing automatically. If it were uploaded to unstable, you'd have to create a placeholder RC bug just to prevent it from migrating, which looks like an ugly piggy-back of the Debian suites and release process to me. Bye, -- intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc | Then we'll come from the shadows. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
