On 07/29/2011 02:53 PM, Jan Dittberner wrote: > I'd like to package Pika for Debian. The associated ITP (intend to > package) bug in the Debian bug tracking system is [1].
Great news! (I CC Gavin, the maintainer) > The Pika web site states that Pika is dual licensed as MPLv1.1 and > GPLv2.0 which both are acceptable free software licenses. What made > me worry are two things: > > - a missing declaration of copyright holders with copyright years in > the COPYING file We could copy the copyright holders from LICENSE-MPL-Pika to COPYING, though we will end up in the same stuff in two places. > - the statement "All rights reserved." at the end of LICENSE-MPL-Pika > that is normally used in proprietary license/copyright texts only This is taken from the MPL template. Marek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
