Bob Proulx <b...@proulx.com> wrote: > Or potentially conflicting with emacs21. That seems harsh.
No need, I just skip byte-compilation and sertup for that one file only on emacs21. > > You know that emacs21 is a few versions behind, right? It's in > > 'oldstable' but not supported. emacs23 is current and emacs24 is about > > to be released... ;-) > > Yes. :-) But most of these machines have been getting upgraded and > upgraded and upgraded. It is one of the best things about Debian! True ! > I am pretty happy to remove emacs21 before doing any more upgrades > from Lenny to Squeeze. That is fine. I will add it to my cleanup > list now that I realize it. But still it was an upgrade failure and > needed extra action to get through and so it would be nice to have it > work without the failure or somehow direct the admin that emacs21 will > be a problem. Certainly if you can mark files as only certain > versions or newer that would seem to be a reasonable solution. No, you are quite right that people may still have emacs21 on their syustem when they upgrade and it's best if there's no failure during installation even if the workings are not perfect afterwards (i.e. pod-mode won't work on emacs21). I'll fix it! Thanks for reporting it! And for the fast and enjoyable interaction! Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
