On 25/07/11 at 04:25 +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hello, > > This bug came up for discussion this evening at DebConf; I think it's > overdue to be followed through on. Lucas seems to agree in the end with my > own believe that there is a weak consensus in favor of the proposed policy, > and it does effectively reflect current practice, so I think applying this > patch in some form is the right thing. > > The biggest remaining point of contention seems to be whether an RC bug > which has had a response from a maintainer indicating that it's in progress > should be covered by the "0 day" policy after 7 days, or if it should be > covered by the "2 day" policy. Since this is contentious, I propose the > more conservative policy be applied, as per the attached patch. > > Comments?
ACK L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
