Hi, On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Modestas Vainius wrote: > What do you think about using a negative dependency template id in order to > trigger dpkg-shlibdeps failure? In my opinion, it's still useful (for > reference purposes) to have version information even for private symbols.
Could be workable I guess. Except that the negation of 0 doesn't exist, so it forces you to have at least one extra dependency template. > P.S. I plan to work on #615940, #630342 and #630344 in the next > days/weeks/month. Maybe I will even propose something acceptable for #533916 > in the process. Are you at debconf this week? Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
