On mer., 2011-07-20 at 11:42 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > >>> Thanks for the patch. But the issue isn't that it builds fine, rather to > >>> be sure that it works. I think I remember this was the reason why we > >>> didn't add it a few months ago. > >>> > >>> Could you by chance test the package on kfreebsd-amd64? > >> > >> Actually, I can't. I'm CCing debian-bsd. If someone who reads this > >> has an amd64 laptop with Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, please consider testing > >> xfce4-battery-plugin in it. > >> > > > > On kfreebsd-i386 xfce4-battery-plugin uses apm emulation which, last > > time we checked, doesn't exist on amd64. > > kfreebsd-8 (8.1-2) unstable; urgency=low > > * Backport apm emulation on amd64 from -CURRENT as it is required by a few > packages: > - patches/105_apm_amd64.diff > -- Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:06:07 +0200 > > Petr
So that mean we can use kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 but not kfreebsd-any since mipsel won't have it, right? Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
