On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:38:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 01:03:00PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > > > See for instance http://bugs.debian.org/233969 for a discussion > > > about it, that also has a patch. > > > > Changing the behavior of the macro would break existing applications. > > The discussion at this url doesn't take that into account. > > Can you elaborate on that? Break in what way? It could find the > wrong include path?
As I read the comment, it sounds as if you're thinking that the macro that doesn't check for Xt can replace the one that does. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
pgpoNcP9NIBB9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
