Package: tesseract
Version: 2.04-2.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch

Attached please find a patch applied recently to Ubuntu 11.10 resolving
the symptom of a sigsegv in tesseract upon encountering a grey-scale
image saved from The GIMP.

Cheers,
-Dan

In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:

  * Add patch from Martin Owens to fix a segfault when tesseract
    encounters a grey-scale image saved from The GIMP (LP: #793002).
    Thanks, Martin!


Thanks for considering the patch.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers oneiric-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oneiric-updates'), (500, 'oneiric-security'), (500, 
'oneiric-proposed'), (500, 'oneiric')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-5-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -u tesseract-2.04/debian/changelog tesseract-2.04/debian/changelog
diff -u tesseract-2.04/debian/patches/series tesseract-2.04/debian/patches/series
--- tesseract-2.04/debian/patches/series
+++ tesseract-2.04/debian/patches/series
@@ -3,0 +4 @@
+tesseract-16bpp
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tesseract-2.04.orig/debian/patches/tesseract-16bpp
+++ tesseract-2.04/debian/patches/tesseract-16bpp
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+Index: tesseract-2.04/image/imgs.cpp
+===================================================================
+--- tesseract-2.04.orig/image/imgs.cpp	2008-03-10 12:22:01.000000000 -0400
++++ tesseract-2.04/image/imgs.cpp	2011-07-17 14:51:47.000000000 -0400
+@@ -250,7 +250,8 @@
+   }
+   if (bits_per_pixel != 1 && bits_per_pixel != 2
+     && bits_per_pixel != 4 && bits_per_pixel != 5
+-  && bits_per_pixel != 6 && bits_per_pixel != 8 && bits_per_pixel != 24) {
++    && bits_per_pixel != 6 && bits_per_pixel != 8
++    && bits_per_pixel != 16 && bits_per_pixel != 24) {
+     BADBPP.error ("check_legal_image_size", TESSLOG, "%d", bits_per_pixel);
+     return -1;
+   }

Reply via email to