On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 09:05 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/7/11 Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>: > > Looking at the BTS, it appears from the log of #601803 that the proposed > > changes to ifconfig for wireless support have not yet been proved to be > > complete and functional in unstable - is that correct? [...] > My local tests are succesful both in stable and unstable too, although > I can't test it completely on my own because there are no visible APs. > However the problem at hand (SIOCIFCREATE2: Bad address) has > definitely disappeared.
Apologies if I'm missing something, but in that case why is #601803 still open? There seemed to be a little confusion at the end of the report as to whether it was fixed or not. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
