On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:42:32PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > tags 633448 +patch +pending > thanks > > 2011/7/10 David Shorten <dpshor...@gmail.com>: > > Package: libpam-encfs > > Version: 0.1.4.1-4 > > Severity: normal > > Tags: patch fixed > > User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de > > Usertags: no-add-needed > > > > The attached patch was applied in ubuntu in order to fix LP#803183. It > > should fix the bug described here. It changes debian/rules so that the > > libraries are ordered correctly. > > Thanks for the info, ...
> I cannot check now in a sid box. Surprisingly I cannot reproduce the problem in a sid box with normal ld linker, /usr/bin/make LDFLAGS="--shared -x -lc" make[1]: Entering directory ... gcc -fPIC -O2 -c -g -Wall -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing pam_encfs.c ld --shared -x -lc -o pam_encfs.so pam_encfs.o -lpam make[1]: Leaving directory ... usr/bin/make LDFLAGS="--as-needed --shared -x -lc" make[1]: Entering directory ... gcc -fPIC -O2 -c -g -Wall -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing pam_encfs.c ld --as-needed --shared -x -lc -o pam_encfs.so pam_encfs.o -lpam make[1]: Leaving directory ... /usr/bin/make LDFLAGS="--no-as-needed --shared -x -lc" make[1]: Entering directory ... gcc -fPIC -O2 -c -g -Wall -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing pam_encfs.c ld --no-as-needed --shared -x -lc -o pam_encfs.so pam_encfs.o -lpam make[1]: Leaving directory ... What is the difference in Ubuntu linker that makes this problem appear there? Seems that Ubuntu is using binutils-gold and --no-as-needed is not emulating it properly regarding this issue. I installed binutils-gold and tried to reproduce the problem with it. No luck. There is however an additional problem with it, current Debian binutils-gold does not know about new Debian multiarch locations, so, $ ld --shared -x -o pam_encfs.so pam_encfs.o -lpam -lc ld: error: cannot find -lc happens in this box unless -L/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu is passed. This is definitely not a problem in libpam-encfs but in binutils-gold linker. > I admit I was a bit surprised that > not having a trailing -lc worked in the strict approach, but it did (I > also played at that time with something similar to the proposed > patch). Will move anyway -lc to EOL, but would really like to know how to reproduce the original problem. -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
