severity 631382 serious thanks On 2011-07-11 21:52, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi, > >> [...] > > Well, the interesting point is that this bug report (#630720) was filed by one > of the eclipse maintainers... I feared that this would break eclipse in some > way, but did not get any response to this request. >
Yes, unfortunately we did not manage to reply you in time before I saw the sat4j upload. :) > Anyhow, I'd suggest either filing a new bug with eclipse or upgrading #631382 > to > higher severity. There are essentially two options out of this mess: either > eclipse being upgraded to 3.7 or me uploading sat4j 2.2.3 once again, as a new > source package. > Technically a bump of the dependencies and rebuild of eclipse is enough, unfortunately every time we do this, we trigger #587657 for all upgraders. >.> > Feel free to quote any of the above in the bug report to eclipse. > No need; I am stalking your package. :D > Best, > Michael > ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
