# maintainer doesn't seem to be interested, but the problem is well understood # and I'm happy to fix it owner 633396 ! tags 63396 - unreproducible moreinfo quit
Hi Rene, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 03:27:09PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Typical experimental amd64 system. From today's upgrade: > > How did you do the upgrade? > > And what is a "typical experimental amd64 system"? I used cupt; you can reproduce it by using dpkg directly, too. Besides, after your explanation it's obvious in the code where the problem is. And the policy is very clear; "apt happens to choose an upgrade path that doesn't trigger it" does not make a bug go away. Anyway, I'm happy to take care of writing a fix and checking that it fixes the problem, so I am not so inclined to attach dpkg logs etc. I should be able to send a fix soon. I'll be glad to hear feedback on it then. Thanks again for your help. Regards, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
