On 2011-07-09T22:22:54-0400, Yaroslav Halchenko <deb...@onerussian.com> wrote:
> Hi Kenyon, thanks for the report/patch...  since it is the same
> function which is used by fail2ban-server as well:  I assuming banning
> upon invalid attempts didn't work either before, right?

No, banning and unbanning worked fine (bans happened after six invalid
attempts, unbans happened after ten minutes) before and after the
patch with ISO 8601 log timestamps. I wondered about that too. I'm not
sure why it worked, and haven't looked into it, since it's working
fine :). It was just strange seeing that output from fail2ban-regex.
Maybe I'll investigate the server if I have time.

-- 
Kenyon Ralph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to