On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 06:04:16PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Roger Leigh 
> 
> | For the case of systemd, the recommendations WRT initscripts
> | dependencies may be inappropriate, in which case I guess this
> | something systemd will already be handling internally (mounting
> | /lib/init/rw).
> 
> Yeah, I'm guessing you're seeing systemd using /lib/init/rw is because
> we ship a mount unit for that directory.  Once all other packages have
> stopped using it we can stop providing it.
> 
> I see that the mount unit does not have a ConditionPathIsDirectory for
> the unit, I'll fix that and then close this bug.

Cool, thanks.

IIRC, I discussed with mbiebl whether or not we should add a versioned
Breaks to initscripts on all packages currently using /lib/init/rw
(once they are fixed to use /run) to ensure that all users of
/lib/init/rw are no longer present, in order to allow the removal of
/lib/init/rw for wheezy.  Would it be appropriate for systemd to also
use the same set of Breaks?


Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux             http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?       http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-    GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to