Hello Aníbal,

2011/7/3 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <ani...@debian.org>:

> After you changed the severity of bug 570676 to serious, I assumed you
> needed libx86 ported to armel.

Oops, I do not remember why I did that, probably result of triagging
bugs and not paying enough attention to this one.

> Anyway, if a source package has never been built on a particular
> architecture, it isn't a serious bug. I'm changing the severity of the
> bug to what it was before.

Sure, that's fine. I think we could add armel and armhf to p-a-s.

Cheers,
-- 
 Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.

<free spam>
-- Would you like to make a donation for Debian Conference?
   ** http://debconf11.debconf.org/payments.xhtml **
</free spam>



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to