> I am not sure how many bug report you are planning to report, Just the one.
> but we are moving to libjpeg8, Fair enough > libjpeg-turbo is a technological dead-end. Could you elaborate on that? Just curious. Thanks David On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Bill Allombert <bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:33:22AM +0100, David Morgado wrote: >> Package: libjpeg6b >> Severity: wishlist >> >> Hello, could you please provide libjpeg-turbo. It is much faster than >> libjpeg on x86 and x64 arch at least. >> >> http://libjpeg-turbo.virtualgl.org/ >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/libjpeg-turbo/ >> >> On Fedora it has replaced libjpeg. >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo > > Hello David, > > I am not sure how many bug report you are planning to report, but we are > moving > to libjpeg8, not libjpeg-turbo. libjpeg-turbo is a technological dead-end. > > Cheers, > -- > Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> > > Imagine a large red swirl here. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
