Hello, Am Sonntag 03 Juli 2011, 18:51:30 schrieben Sie: > > I don't see any nvidia driver packages installed on your machine. So no > alternative registered.
the nvidia-driver is installed via DKMS. > > lists only mesa but no nvidia, so I guess there is a problem with the > > alternative-trigger. The trigger-file for nvidia in the source-package is > > rather short (compared with the for mesa or fglrx), so I guess it is > > incomplete. I noticed that a similar problem was there with fglrx (Bug > > 631680). > > No, it's sufficient, because it's a two stage trigger, the file-triggers > all belong to nvidia-alternative. ok, sorry for the misunderstanding by me. > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Jul 3 16:52 > > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so -> > > /etc/alternatives/glx--libglx.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 426497 Jul 18 > > 2008 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so.173.14.09 -rw-r--r-- 1 > > root root 426657 Aug 15 2008 > > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so.debian -rw-r--r-- 1 root root > > 424173 Jun 1 2007 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so.old > > There seem to be some ancient files from unknown sources lying around: > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so.* I deleted them, but it doesn't helped of corse. What helped in the end: Installing libgl1-nvidia-glx from unstable and installing xserver-xorg-video- nvidia from unstable too. I guess this bug can be closed now. Thanks for your time and help :-). > > Andreas Sincerly, DaB.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
