On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:35:54AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > On 21 June 2011 10:12, Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au> wrote: > > Sorry about this. The upstream Makefiles are suppose to remove this > > cruft - debian/rules clean calls debian/rules distclean, but for > > reasons I don't understand it doesn't always work. However it seemed > > to work fine for this version before squeeze was released. Go > > figure.... > > > > If this is not acceptable, I can upload a new version that has an > > expanded clean section in debian/rules - would this be OK? > > In this case I am guessing I would have increase the version number? > I just realized I never got a response to my email. Can you please > respond and I can prepare a new upload?
I'll mark the package for REJECT at the next dinstall run. You'll most likely get a mail about it. Afterwards you can reuse the old version. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `- finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
