Hi! On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 17:03:20 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > I noticed libmd has its own directory in SVN. Is there any > reason for not merging it in freebsd-libs? > > If it's because of "Architecture: any" setting, note that > freebsd-libs already includes portable libraries (like > libsbuf).
Few reasons, one has been because libmd is more generic than something like libsbuf and it's prone to be used more widely than anything in freebsd-libs, so it might make sense to promote it to standard or higher for example. The other reason is that the licenses in the FreeBSD tree are a bit unfortunate so my plan is to use the OpenBSD implementation instead. Just have to commit my latest changes. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
