Am 08.06.2011 23:22, schrieb Bill Allombert: > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:25:18AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have attached the full patch against current policy.git. This is >> identical to the previous patches, with the addition of a single >> sentence to the footnote: >> >> "Additionally, the subdirectory <file>/run/shm</file> is a replacement >> for <file>/dev/shm</file>." >> >> This is to update the previous draft with the current set of mounts >> on /run established by initscripts at boot time (/run, /run/lock and >> /run/shm). I have put this sentence after the comment about the >> FHS because TTBOMK this is not currently in the initial FHS proposal, >> though I will bring it up on the FHS list as an optional feature (this >> subdirectory has not yet been adopted more widely). If this addition >> is not useful (it's not a top-level dir), I can remove it. > > Hello Cyril and Michael, > > Are you willing to resecond this as the final version ?
At the current state, I'm not for adding /run/shm to debian-policy. If we can get wider acceptance of this feature (cross-distro), then my position on this might change. Atm this looks like a Debian-only feature with no real use-case why we need that. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
