Hi Adam, On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 20:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 20:09 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > some programms make rdesktop to fail to keep up the directory > > forwarding to an win 2k8-server. Please see > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2812158&group_id=24366&atid=381349 > > for the bug, the fix is as follows: > > > > --- rdesktop-1.6.0.orig/disk.c 2009-06-19 09:06:27.000000000 -0400 > > +++ rdesktop-1.6.0/disk.c 2009-06-25 09:40:44.000000000 -0400 > > @@ -1096,10 +1101,24 @@ > [...] > > This is nearly, but not quite, the same as the corresponding code in the > current rdesktop package in unstable. Other than the printf(), the > difference is that where the proposed fix has: > > > + out_uint32_le(out, stat_fs.f_blocks); /* > > TotalAllocationUnits */ > > + out_uint32_le(out, 0); > > + out_uint32_le(out, stat_fs.f_bavail); /* > > CallerAvailableAllocationUnits */ > > + out_uint32_le(out, 0); > > the package in unstable has: > > out_uint32_le(out, stat_fs.f_blocks); /* Total > allocation units low */ > out_uint32_le(out, 0); /* Total allocation units > high */ > out_uint32_le(out, stat_fs.f_blocks); /* Caller > allocation units low */ > out_uint32_le(out, 0); /* Caller allocation units > high */ > > I've CCed the rdesktop maintainers for any comments they might have. IMHO the former one is the correct, the changes in unstable seem to have a copy&paste bug. stat_fs.f_blocks may has nothing to do with 'caller allocation units low'. Will ask upstream soon.
Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
