Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.16.x transition.
There are new versions of packages which start to require an updated
Poppler, and our current version (0.12.x) is a bit old.
Currently we have Poppler 0.16.3 in experimental already, and Poppler
0.16.6 is planned for unstable (same SONAMEs for libraries as 0.16.3).
This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following
ways:
- libpoppler5 → libpoppler13
- libpoppler-glib4 → libpoppler-glib6
- libpoppler-qt2 -- qt3 frontend, dropped (no rdeps in testing & sid)
- libpoppler-qt4-3 -- BC with 0.12, but bumps shlibs
Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition,
and their situation, sorted by solutions:
Sources that can be binNMU'ed:
apvlv (poppler-glib)
auto-multiple-choice (poppler)
cups (poppler)
epdfview (poppler-glib)
gambas2 (poppler)
gdcm (poppler)
gimp (poppler-glib)
gpdftext (poppler-glib)
gnome-commander (poppler)
gummi (poppler-glib)
inkscape (poppler, poppler-glib)
koffice (poppler)
libreoffice (poppler)
luatex (poppler)
pdf-presenter-console (poppler-glib)
pdf2djvu (poppler)
pdf2svg (poppler-glib)
pdfcube (poppler-glib)
pdfgrep (poppler)
pdftoipe (poppler)
popplerkit.framework (poppler)
referencer (poppler-glib)
ruby-gnome2 (poppler-glib)
texlive-bin (poppler)
tracker (poppler-glib)
tumbler (poppler-glib)
xournal (poppler-glib)
webkit2pdf (poppler-glib)
zathura (poppler-glib)
Sources that need a custom solution:
* evince (poppler-glib)
evince 2.30 does not support poppler-glib 0.16. The solution which
Michael Biebl, Josselin Mouette and me discussed was to update to
evince 2.32 (which though requires poppler 0.14, so cannot be
uploaded right now) + a needed upstream patch to unstable, aside
gnome-python-desktop 2.32 too (g-p-d 2.30 does not support evince
2.32).
(Please note evince 2.23 would need to pass through NEW, and
experimental has evince 3.x already.)
* poppler-sharp (poppler-glib)
This is an arch:all package, so it needs a sourceful upload.
A couple of months ago, I talked with Chow Loong Jin (hyperair,
CC'ed) on IRC about this transition, and he told me that he knew
about this already, and he had to fix this manually, and to let him
know about the transition time.
This package has only one rdepend, pdfmod.
* python-poppler (poppler-glib)
The (small) patch needed to compile with poppler 0.16 is not
compatible with poppler 0.12, so it cannot be uploaded right now.
Asked to provide a version in experimental compilable with poppler
0.16, see #628047.
* xpdf (poppler)
The (small) patch needed to compile with poppler 0.16 is not
compatible with poppler 0.12, so it cannot be uploaded right now.
Asked to provide a version in experimental compilable with poppler
0.16, see #627667.
Other cases:
* derivations (poppler)
This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is
only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of
that application are left in the resulting arch:all package.
This source can be left out of the transition.
I grouped all the bugs mentioned above (even the solved ones) with the
following usertag:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=toscano.p...@tiscali.it;tag=poppler-0.16
Possible conflicts with other transitions:
* inkscape is part of the current imagemagick4 transition (#625544)
* poppler-sharp is a mono/CLI package, and I saw there is a transition
tracker for a mono transition (but no transition bug open, yet?),
so most probably this transition should be done before or after the
mono one
* webkit2pdf possibly could be in common with the asked (but not yet
ack'ed, though) webkit transition (#622371)
In the end, to help you according to other transition trackers:
- "affected" packages: b-d on libpoppler-dev or libpoppler-glib-dev
- "bad" packages: depends on libpoppler5 or libpoppler-glib4
- "good" packages: depends on libpoppler13 or libpoppler-glib6
Thanks,
--
Pino
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
