On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 18:28 -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > MPICH and LAM are *not* binary compatible, so it's not possible to > > configure their links at runtime. That's why PETSc links specifically > > to the mpich libraries. It is not possible to use the alternatives > > system to switch between them. > > > > But you can configure PETSc to use lam. The details on how to do this > > are in the README.Debian file which comes with libpetsc2.2.0-dev. > > You should tell all this to the DOLFIN developers. I don't understand > these issues that well, and am not in a position to change things (if > necessary) anyway. > > > How that will work with 2.3.0 will depend on how I package it. I'm > > afraid I'm stuck now on getting hypre to build at all with the new > > toolchain, spent about eight hours on it yesterday. :-( When all of the > > new mpich dependencies get into testing, then I'll focus on petsc again. > > Ok. I think that a little communication up front with the DOLFIN > developers would be beneficial to make sure the Debian DOLFIN package is > compatable with the Debian PETSc package. If you could send me a preview > of the Debian PETSc 2.3 package when it is available, I'll try to get > DOLFIN to build against it.
Okay, I'll do so when I have a package ready. Thanks, -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
