Hi Bill On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 08:35:39AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Bill > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:25:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:31:51AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Hi Dominic > > > > > > Only read trough yet (but not native english speaker): > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:35:16PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> > > > > --- > > > > perl-policy.sgml | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/perl-policy.sgml b/perl-policy.sgml > > > > index b9f3277..47cf9f6 100644 > > > > --- a/perl-policy.sgml > > > > +++ b/perl-policy.sgml > > > > @@ -461,6 +461,26 @@ perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ldopts > > > > package must depend upon it explicitly. > > > > </p> > > > > </sect> > > > > + > > > > + <sect id="perl_upgrades"> > > > > + <heading>Perl Package Upgrades</heading> > > > > + <p> > > > > + Starting from <package>perl</package> 5.12.3-2, a dpkg > > > > trigger > > > > + named <var>perl-major-upgrade</var> will be triggered by the > > > > + postinst of the <package>perl</package> package during major > > > > + upgrades. Some examples of things which consitute a major > > > > upgrade > > > > > > consitute -> constitute > > > > Hello Salvatore, > > > > Are you willing to second it ? > > Yes, if Niko as maintainer of perl package with Dominic agrees on it > too, I would like to second the proposal with the latest patch > provided by Dominic (with the spelling fixes). > > But I would prefer to hear opinion from Niko to be sure.
As Niko gave his ok too: I'm seconding the change. Bests Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
