severity 218529 wishlist thanks Hi,
I recently had a chance to fix rendering bugs which had real impacts to the use of this debiandoc-sgml (#593916, #594846, #238003). I am cleaning BTS data for further improvements. So far, last 6 years, practically all patches or improvements have been done by me. When I get a useful patches such as #443765, I included them. My updates include major changes to support UTF-8. Based on this situation, I do not consider Ardo as upstream any more. (I think he is no more DD and not active on DDP. I am the practical upstream and maintainer. No one came up last 8 years with patch on this Bug #218529, either. In 2008, I marked this as moreinfo but no one provided. I consider bug reports on the bad command syntax design problems (Bug #218529 and #430572) are feature requests. No documetation said you can use this command in the way requested in BTS and no programs were broken by these. I agree these are non-optimal implementation but still consider wishlist bugs. Unlike other random wishlist bugs which I marked as wontfix, I think if anyone provide accountable patch with good testing, I will consider to include such patch. Please do not change severity without discussing it with me. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
