On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 21:55:15 -0400, James Vega wrote:
> Thanks!

No, thank you for the improvements! :)

> Attached automake.vim should cover that scenario properly.  I just
> pulled the _LDADD matches into their own rule.

Nice. Maybe we could even go further and convert it to a makeError?

> I also fixed the += support you added.  The \= wasn't necessary in +\==
> and would actually cause things to mishighlight due to the me=e-2
> pattern offset (e.g., foo_SOURCES+= a).

Ah! I cannot remember, but probably I carried those over from when I
had them in a single line.

> Also, as the note at the top of the file suggests, the syntax file is
> looking for a new maintainer.  ;)

Right, but I fear I already have my plate full. :/

thanks,
guillem



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to