I'll give it a shot, I hadn't realized that it had entered unstable/testing
yet, thought it was still in experimental.

micah

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005, Lawrence Williams wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Why not use python-wxgtk2.6?? I am using it now and the interface is so much 
> cleaner and easier on the eyes :)
> 
> Thanks
> Lawrence
> 
> On September 6, 2005 08:14 pm, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > tag 326701 +pending
> > thanks
> >
> > Yep, it was switched to the 2.4.1-python dependency because the 2.4-python
> > one went away, now its back and I can switch it back and upload that.
> >
> > On Mon, 05 Sep 2005, Lawrence Williams wrote:
> > > A simple solution that works is to download the source and change the
> > > Depend on libwxgtk2.4-1-python to python-wxgtk2.6.
> > >
> > > Build and the packages will work fine. I did it myself and like it much
> > > better.
> > >
> > > Lawrence


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to