Hallo, does anyone have some information for this entry? Is it really bug in recipe-processing or is it correct?
I would be glad, if you can make a statement at least. Either it is a bug and you can provide info, how the code should work correctly (I can patch it myself). Or it is a correct feature, then please, provide an example of recipe how to define single 10GB primary partition on the 100GB disk with leaving the rest 90GB unallocated. Thank you very much. Regards, Robert Wolf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org