Le Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:18:17PM +0100, Stuart Prescott a écrit :
>
> Currently, §7.1 refers to the archtecture restriction syntax and architecture
> wildards without defining what the syntax for these restrictions is. The
> syntax for these clauses is defined in §11.1 (§11.1.1 in particular) but is
> not
> linked to from §7.1.
Dear Stuart and everybody,
the attached patch could add the links.
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
>From 17065d92ee2164156150da98b11b1ba0e2e7003b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 09:38:53 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Link=20=C2=A77.1=20(relationship=20fields)=20to=20=C2=A711.1=20architecture=20specification=20strings?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Thanks to Stuart Prescott for the suggestion. Closes: #628174
---
policy.sgml | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 7377752..6efdef4 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -4627,6 +4627,7 @@ Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.1), exim | mail-transport-agent
architectures. This is indicated in brackets after each
individual package name and the optional version specification.
The brackets enclose a list of Debian architecture names
+ in the format described in <ref id="arch-spec">,
separated by whitespace. Exclamation marks may be prepended to
each of the names. (It is not permitted for some names to be
prepended with exclamation marks while others aren't.)
@@ -4694,7 +4695,8 @@ Build-Depends: foo [!i386] | bar [!amd64]
<p>
Relationships may also be restricted to a certain set of
- architectures using architecture wildcards. The syntax for
+ architectures using architecture wildcards in the format
+ described in <ref id="arch-wildcard-spec">. The syntax for
declaring such restrictions is the same as declaring
restrictions using a certain set of architectures without
architecture wildcards. For example:
--
1.7.2.5
