Hi Jonathan, On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:05:24PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > The above (and analogous in other changelog) changes do not seem right > --- since the function was historically called set_endianess (sic), > I'd think the changelog should use the old name.
I wondered about that too, there's no point rewriting history! > If I were doing it, I think I'd split this into a few patches: > > - first user-visible messages > - then comments > - then code changes (variable and function names) > > and send them to binut...@sourceware.org for comments. That way, it > would be easier for upstream to take the simplest and most interesting > ones quickly and to review the rest easily, too. OK, will do. Regards, Stephen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
