ke, 2005-08-31 kello 17:31 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz kirjoitti: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:27:58AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > Now I'm glad I didn't mark it critical. *Blush* A bad thinko on my part, > > I completely misremembered how grep works with regard to exit codes. > > Sorry. (I need to learn to stop filing bugs when it gets late.) > > > > However, it now strikes me, as I try to think carefully about this, that > > if grep fails for any other reason than "no lines found", e.g., because > > the disk is full and the redirection fails, the postrm script > > erroneously removes /etc/ld.so.conf. Or am I being an idiot again? > > If your disk is full during a dpkg upgrade, don't you think this is the > least of the many things that is going to go wrong?
This is true, I guess. I admit I can't come up with a scenario where things will fail. I guess I'm just paranoid enough that I'd prefer an empty ld.so.conf over the highly unlikely chance of removing it completely due to an accident. In other words, if you disagree, you can ignore that part of the bug report and sorry about the trouble. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
