Hi Christian, On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 19:48 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > I don't understand bug #586592. > > You reported this bug against a swat verson that's uncommon. > > Do you know whether such bugs exists in samba 3 as it is now? It should actually be a bug against the 'swat2' package, so I made a mistake in filing it against 'swat'. The confusing bit is that the swat2 package is actually also named swat upstream.
I've reassigned the package, thanks for following up on this. Cheers, Jelmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
