Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> writes: > On Sun, 15 May 2011, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I'm probably just reading a bit too much finality into "next version of >> dpkg (1.16.1) will keep," but it can be a bit off-putting to get the >> feeling that dpkg's source code is authoritative for the meaning of >> Policy-standardized fields and the rest of the project is expected to >> get in line without any other discussion. I think it creates some >> unnecessary tension that the above order would have defused. > Well, it was not meant to override the normal process, but I expected it > would not create problems so I did it all at once. But you're entirely > entitled to mark the lintian bug as blocked by the policy one (that's > why I mentioned that I was filing a policy one in parallel). I was probably just being too sensitive to this. Thanks! The Policy bug has been committed, so we're good to go on prerequisites. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
