On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:14:16AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> writes: > > Yeah, it's basically a tradeoff between chroot handling and "nested" > symlinks. I suppose I'm probably old-school here, in that I learned how > to do UNIX system administration before such things as bind mounts and > back when disks were tiny, so I've used top-level symlinks to move things > around a lot and appreciated Debian's care in ensuring that didn't break > symlinks. However, Bill correctly points out that the world has moved on > and bind mounts are usually a better solution.
It just happens that I used proprietary OS with feature similar to bind mounts years before Linux supported them :-) Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
