On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 20:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 20:57 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 00:27:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > - unstable's ristretto doesn't depend on libthunar-vfs-1-2, so the > > > package isn't marked for checking again > > > > > hrm, but why does unstable's ristretto matter at that point, rather than > > testing's? (Apologies if I'm missing something obvious.) > > It's not unstable's ristretto so much as unstable's thunar-vfs. [...] > I'm fairly sure one of my earlier debugging sessions included > re-scanning for affected packages after the reverse dependency list had > been updated, but it's not in my current version; I'll have another look > at that.
I did that, and remembered why I removed the code after the first attempt. The dependencies of libthunar-vfs-1-2 are used to ensure it is listed as a reverse dependency where appropriate, but we want to recompute its r-dep list instead. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
