Hi,
Me again. Just had a small chat in the IRC channel. Your patch will probably
solve
the problem of evas on hurd. But it will break ecore/evas and ecore/e17. So it
does
not seem to be a good option at the moment. Maybe you could post your problem
and patch over the mail list of enlightenment, so they can have a better look
at it.
Oh and EFL and e17 are not yet ported to hurd.
Mark-Willem
> Le 05/05/11 13:47, Mark-Willem Jansen a écrit :
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> > Maybe you could rewrite the patch, so the pre-compiler checks the existence
> > of SA_SIGINFO and selects the appropriate code. For example.
>
> [snip]
>
> > This way the patch will not effect the architects that have SA_SIGINFO
> > defined.
>
> I can, but wouldn't that make the code more complex than it needs to be,
> considering that the features provided by SA_SIGINFO aren't used at all?
> I usually try to avoid adding a lot of #ifdef/#endif when it's not needed.
>
> Nevertheless, if you think it's better this way, then I'll do it. I'll
> have to check that no other portability problems have appeared in
> libevas since last July, though.
>
> > Mark-Willem Jansen
>
> Thanks for the answer!
>
> --
> Manuel Menal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
