On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:25:16PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > Package: libfile-path-perl > Version: 2.08-1 > Severity: grave > X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org > > perl-modules 5.12.3-6 Breaks: libfile-path-perl (<< 2.08.01), because > the core version (2.08_01) is newer than the CPAN one (2.08). This > makes the separate package uninstallable. > > I see the Breaks entry could be looser, as the only core deviations from > 2.08 are specific to VMS and Darwin. > > > http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/c2c3358345e7fa3b89ecbd334f68d57057182d27 > > http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/52bbce6d8fa698c93c0072230ffd19aba925088b > > Still, the only collateral damage I can see with a few quick grep-dctrl > runs is > > libcipux-perl (#624304)
Seems to be fixed in a recent upload although the bug hasn't been closed. > liborlite-perl (at least Build-Depends-Indep, not sure if the Depends > entry works. No bug yet.) Fixed by gregoa. > so there doesn't seem to be much real benefit to loosening the Breaks > entry either. > > I don't really mind either way. So, since the above have been fixed, am I right in thinking that it would be appropriate to request removal of this package in unstable? Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
