> > I have found that when bash completion is activated, the output of the > > set command is exagerately verbose, as if bash was ran with the > > parameter -x. > > > > This renders the set command unusable, thus the severity. > > I haven't checked, but I belive this could break bash scripting > > (although I doubt it as the console will not be in interactive mode, so > > there might be no interference from the completion). > > There's not much that can be done about this, I'm afraid. The set > built-in displays the current environment, and that includes any > functions that have been defined. bash completion makes heavy use of > shell functions. > > It would be nice if there were an option to set to display the > environment minus any defined shell functions. Perhaps this could be > suggested to the bash maintainer, Chet Ramey.
I think this could be a good approach to the problem. I don't find any reason for the functions to be added to the environment. -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
