To mirror admin of Netease, On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 02:25, Simon Paillard <spaill...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 04:17:01PM +0800, mirror wrote: >> >> After double-check every rsync requirement, we think it is not necessary >> >> to >> >> usring the new version ftpsync. Please don't worry about it, we promise >> >> they >> >> do the same job. > > And the problem happened. > There is something wrong (that cannot be avoided as you run your own script..) > http://mirrors.163.com/.help/mirror-scripts/config/debian > > See up to date exclusion list > http://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror#how >
I think switching to ftpsync is just a matter of man power. You only cost one time to set up everything, then you'll benefit from it a lot. Why not switch to it? >> >>>> Main mirror is updated from: ftp.tw.debian.org >> >>>> Backports mirror is updated from: ftp.tw.debian.org >> > >> > Are you pushed for backports too ? >> Yes. Is it required a new request for backports mirror list? > > Pushed by who ? ftp.de ? > After looking at the trace file, it seems that you are syncing from mirrors.kernel.org? Maybe you would like to try to sync from mirrors4.ustc.edu.cn, which will become ftp.cn.d.o soon. If the speed is acceptable then you can set up pushing mirror with it. http://mirrors.163.com/debian/project/trace/ -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
