On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 19:26:32 +0100 Esteban Manchado Velázquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I'm looking at this bug, but I don't know what to do. If the only problem > is lowercasing sections, it's already done (it seems). > > However, I've found a couple of empty titles myself: > > -------------------------------- 8< -------------------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/dhelp/dhelp-0.5.21$ egrep -r "TITLE><" > /usr/share/doc/HTML > /usr/share/doc/HTML/standards/index.html:<TITLE></TITLE> > /usr/share/doc/HTML/web/w3c/index.html:<TITLE></TITLE> > -------------------------------- >8 -------------------------------- > > I wondered, then, if "standards" and "web/w3c" were valid sections, so I > looked for the canonical doc-base section list. What I found was: > > -------------------------------- 8< -------------------------------- > Section > Section where the document belongs; this should follow the > sections outlined in The Debian Menu sub-policy. > -------------------------------- >8 -------------------------------- > > (in /usr/share/doc/doc-base/doc-base.txt.gz) But the Debian Menu sub-policy > section list > (http://www.us.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu-policy/ch2.html) doesn't > seem to be used everytime. I have a couple of packages installed, right now, > with documentation registered in sections not in the Menu sub-policy. > > So, what's the canonical list? And, if it's the Debian Menu sub-policy one, > why doesn't doc-base give a warning or some hint? There was a discussion with the doc-base maintainer a long time ago, but I don't remember it anymore. Bye Racke -- LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/ Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration ICDEVGROUP => http://www.icdevgroup.org/ Interchange Development Team
