I would guess so from documentation:
http://www.openssl.org/docs/ssl/SSL_CTX_new.html
but if you want to be extra sure, you can use this patch:
diff -urNap boost1.46-1.46.1~/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp
boost1.46-1.46.1/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp
--- boost1.46-1.46.1~/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp
2011-01-17
04:28:16.000000000 +0000
+++ boost1.46-1.46.1/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp
2011-05-02
14:30:53.318885601 +0000
@@ -67,13 +67,9 @@ public:
switch (m)
{
case context_base::sslv2:
- impl = ::SSL_CTX_new(::SSLv2_method());
- break;
case context_base::sslv2_client:
- impl = ::SSL_CTX_new(::SSLv2_client_method());
- break;
case context_base::sslv2_server:
- impl = ::SSL_CTX_new(::SSLv2_server_method());
+ #error "SSLv2 support was removed from Debian"
break;
case context_base::sslv3:
impl = ::SSL_CTX_new(::SSLv3_method());
Or you can rename sslv2, sslv_client and sslv2_server in
context_base.hpp (removal would change ABI which you probably don't
want):
diff -urNap boost1.46-1.46.1~/boost/asio/ssl/context_base.hpp
boost1.46-1.46.1/boost/asio/ssl/context_base.hpp
--- boost1.46-1.46.1~/boost/asio/ssl/context_base.hpp 2011-01-17
04:28:16.000000000 +0000
+++ boost1.46-1.46.1/boost/asio/ssl/context_base.hpp 2011-05-02
14:35:52.281385405 +0000
@@ -34,13 +34,13 @@ public:
enum method
{
/// Generic SSL version 2.
- sslv2,
+ disabled_sslv2,
/// SSL version 2 client.
- sslv2_client,
+ disabled_sslv2_client,
/// SSL version 2 server.
- sslv2_server,
+ disabled_sslv2_server,
/// Generic SSL version 3.
sslv3,
O.
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 16:26, Steve M. Robbins <st...@sumost.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:26:33PM +0200, Ond??ej Sur?? wrote:
>> retitle 621402 libboost1.46-dev: FTBFS rdepends:
>> /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:73:
>> error: '::SSLv2_method' has not been declared
>> tags 621402 +patch
>> thank you
>>
>> The attached patch fixed rdepends FTBFSes...
>
> Yes, but is it safe in the sense that falling through
> to the "default" case signals an error? (Hopefully with
> a useful diagnostic)
>
> -S
>
>>
>> O.
>>
>> --- /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp~
>> 2011-04-16
>> 07:02:40.000000000 +0000
>> +++ /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp
>> 2011-05-02
>> 12:05:51.914885474 +0000
>> @@ -66,15 +66,6 @@ public:
>> {
>> switch (m)
>> {
>> - case context_base::sslv2:
>> - impl = ::SSL_CTX_new(::SSLv2_method());
>> - break;
>> - case context_base::sslv2_client:
>> - impl = ::SSL_CTX_new(::SSLv2_client_method());
>> - break;
>> - case context_base::sslv2_server:
>> - impl = ::SSL_CTX_new(::SSLv2_server_method());
>> - break;
>> case context_base::sslv3:
>> impl = ::SSL_CTX_new(::SSLv3_method());
>> break;
>>
>>
>> --
>> ???Ond??ej Sur?? <ond...@sury.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkg-boost-devel mailing list
>> pkg-boost-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-boost-devel
>
--
Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
