On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:21:48PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sunday 04 September 2005 16:11, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> Martin Rydstr|m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:38:59PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> > It parses /etc/termcap directly itself. > > >> The /etc/termcap in termcap-compat is well outdated. > >> > >> You can create one yourself using 'tic -C', from what I have read > >> (ncurses-bin and ncurses-base). I tried this with 'misc/terminfo.src' > >> from the ncurses source package, and it appeared to work correctly. > > > > I think it will be easiest to just remove terminal hemlock from the > > package, I have not seen anyone using it in the last few years. Any > > objections?
I use it, but you've never seen me. ;) No matter; I'm fairly certain I can live with fixing up stuff so I can still use it. I think it's not a great solution to remove a feature just because people don't want /etc/termcap around, but I guess that is the way it works. (I don't know what you mean by "remove terminal hemlock", but disabling stuff just because there is no /etc/termcap in Debian would, I think, be a bit unnecessary; it does, after all, check $TERMCAP before it checks for /etc/termcap. I, personally, would probably just get a /etc/termcap from somewhere. On the other hand, I can also live without using packaged CMUCL.) 'mr -- [Emacs] is written in Lisp, which is the only computer language that is beautiful. -- Neal Stephenson, _In the Beginning was the Command Line_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]