On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:43:12AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Don, 2011-04-28 at 11:25 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:17:34AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Don, 2011-04-28 at 10:45 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:15:00AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:06:01AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:00:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > > > > On 04/28/2011 09:57 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > > > >Take the build log, remove all lines without -fPIC, you'll only > > > > > > > >get > > > > > > > >lines for building binaries and objects that aren't linked into > > > > > > > >libxul.so. QED. > > > > > > No possibility of e.g. a static library being linked into a shared > > > object? > > > > None from the iceweasel source, at least. > > I think so far the most likely origin of the R_PPC_REL24 relocations > seems libgcc.a. Matthias, do you concur? If so, any ideas what the > iceweasel build might be doing wrong? Or otherwise, any ideas for > isolating where they're coming from?
See my other message. > > > > > I'll also add that the symbol for which the relocation is failing, > > > > > _restgpr_29_x, comes from gcc, in gcc/config/rs6000/crtresxgpr.asm. > > > > > But you're right, it's most probably not a toolchain problem. > > > > > > > > Even better, if I download xulrunner-1.9.1_1.9.1.18-1_powerpc.deb and > > > > take a look at the relocations in libxul.so, I can't even find the > > > > relocation ld.so is complaining about. > > > > > > How did you look? > > > > > > daenzer@thor|11:11:06> objdump -R /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.1/libxul.so|grep > > > R_PPC_REL24 > > > 0033faa0 R_PPC_REL24 _restgpr_29_x > > > 0033fdc0 R_PPC_REL24 _restgpr_29_x > > > 0033fea0 R_PPC_REL24 _restgpr_29_x > > > [...] > > > > > > 47132 hits. > > > > And none of the offsets match the end of the relocation address ld.so is > > talking about. > > Not sure that matters at all. A R_PPC_REL24 relocation in a shared > object is a bug. > > > P.S. /usr/lib/xulrunner-2.0/libxul.so seems contaminated as well. ... but somehow worked during the test suite. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
