On 2011-04-25 Steve Langasek <steve.langa...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 05:19:01PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> On 2011-04-20 Debian Bug Tracking System <ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote: [...] >>> #619552: pacemaker: please wipe out dependency_libs from .la files (Policy >>> 10.2) >> a part of the bug is still present in 1.0.10-6, the heartbeat plugin's >> libtool la file still has the nonempty dependency_libs:
> dependency_libs in a plugin .la file have no real impact that I'm aware of, > and certainly no impact on archive buildability. Hello, the major impact they have for me is that they trigger the tracker page <http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt>, listing pacemaker as one of the packages blocking me from dropping la files in gnutls26 and libgcrypt11. > As far as I'm concerned, the bug I filed is already fixed (even if > the bug title might have suggested otherwise). Andreas, could you > please either open a separate bug report, or mark yourself as the > submitter of this one? I really have no interest in the question of > dependency_libs in plugins. :) I have changed the submitter address. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
