Hi!

On 22/04/11 13:09, Torsten Werner wrote:
>> In #465900 I can see that the idea of removing dh-kpatches comes from
>> the urge of removing alcovebook-sgml (with dh-kpatches build-depending
>> on it). Maybe we can make dh-kpatches build without alcovebook-sgml?
> 
> maybe. May you check that?

Consider the attached patch. Works for me. :-)

bye,
  Roland
diff -ruN temp/dh-kpatches-0.99.36/debian/control dh-kpatches-0.99.36/debian/control
--- temp/dh-kpatches-0.99.36/debian/control	2003-11-16 19:33:02.000000000 +0100
+++ dh-kpatches-0.99.36/debian/control	2011-04-24 13:55:03.000000000 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: devel
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Yann Dirson <dir...@debian.org>
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 4), docbook-utils, docbook, debiandoc-sgml, sgml2x (>= 1.0.0), alcovebook-sgml, openjade1.3, gtk-doc-tools, nowebm, dh-buildinfo
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 4), docbook-utils, docbook, debiandoc-sgml, sgml2x (>= 1.0.0), openjade1.3, gtk-doc-tools, nowebm, dh-buildinfo
 Standards-Version: 3.5.10
 
 Package: dh-kpatches
diff -ruN temp/dh-kpatches-0.99.36/doc/Makefile dh-kpatches-0.99.36/doc/Makefile
--- temp/dh-kpatches-0.99.36/doc/Makefile	2003-06-24 23:49:04.000000000 +0200
+++ dh-kpatches-0.99.36/doc/Makefile	2011-04-24 14:11:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -52,6 +52,6 @@
 	rmdir -p $*-html
 
 %.pdf: %.docbook.sgml
-	docbook-2-pdf --dssslproc openjade1.3 -s bookarticle $<
+	docbook-2-pdf --dssslproc openjade1.3 $<
 
 .DELETE_ON_ERROR:

Reply via email to