On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Julien Lavergne wrote: > Le Monday 18 April 2011 à 21:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > First of all, I wanted to suggest to drop the Conflicts and just keep the > > Replaces. The Replaces is enough, the only problem is that the FDI file > > will be lost if libimobiledevice2 is removed while some application > > still use libimobiledevice1 (the other cases are correctly handled by dpkg > > whatever the order of installation of the packages). > Ok, It sounds reasonable. I'll try to update it this week-end, but feel > free to NMU it if it's an emergency.
This WE should be fine, thanks. > > > Those uploads will be needed anyway, as I think libimobiledevice2 > > > is/will not be API-compatible with libimobiledevice1. So, could be a > > > moot point. > > > > Julien (Lavergne), do you know if this is the case? > For now, only new API was added, but as they declared the API not > stable, we can't be sure what is going to change. To be safe, I prefer > to assume that the API can change, that's why it should stay in > experimental until 1.2.0 is released. The stable release of "gvfs" depends on this new API apparently due to this new feature: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636132 Do you know when upstream plans to release 1.2.0? Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
