On lun., 2011-04-18 at 16:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > That's the Debian Squeeze SyncEvolution .deb. It correctly depends on > libecal1.2-7 because that is what it was compiled against.
Yes, that's unfortunate. See what is done in evolution itself, where it depends on libs >= 2.30, libs << 2.32. > > Yes, there should be a syncevolution compiled in Testing against > libecal1.2-8. It's currently only in unstable (different story). But > that misses the point: a user who does "aptitude -t testing evolution" > on Squeeze with pinning will end up with a broken system even if there > was such a package. Yes, we had the same kind of issue and we fixed it with the above depends. -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
